The Alaska House of Representatives advanced legislation Tuesday requiring the state to pay contractors and nonprofits within 30 days, adopting a phased implementation after contentious floor debate over fiscal costs and federal funding concerns.

House Bill 133 would standardize payment timelines to 30 days for nonprofits, municipalities, and Alaska Native organizations. Representative Rebecca Himschoot introduced the bill in February after complaints about chronic payment delays. Some payments average over 60 days, according to testimony from the Alaska Municipal League and tribal organizations during committee hearings.

The House adopted the Finance Committee substitute by a 21-19 vote after removing controversial language directing use of Rural Health Transformation Program funds for technology upgrades.

"This bill has had a long path," Himschoot said. "The basic changes are to standardize the payment timelines to make it 30 days for everyone."

The bill underwent 13 hearings across three committees before reaching the House floor. First read and referred to the Community and Regional Affairs and State Affairs committees on March 12, 2025, the bill moved through CRA in April 2025, State Affairs in January 2026, and Finance in April 2026. Fiscal notes totaling over $7 million raised concerns about implementation costs and potential fines departments would pay for late payments.

"15 fiscal notes from the various departments with cumulative six-year projected cost of in excess of $7 million," Representative DeLena Johnson said. She proposed amendments to ease the transition.

The House rejected amendments requiring performance metrics and resource development compliance by 19-21 votes. Representative Dan Saddler argued agencies should have clear standards before facing penalties.

"If we are going to fine an agency for failing to meet an arbitrary deadline imposed upon it, it's only right that there be a clear timeline to avoid confusion," Saddler said.

The House adopted an amendment requiring transparency reporting on the state checkbook website and another establishing a one-year phase-in period starting at 45 days before moving to 30 days. The phase-in timeline reflected concerns raised by the Alaska Municipal League and tribal organizations during March committee testimony about the impact of payment delays exceeding 60 days on their operations.

"This is a really great compromise amendment because it does allow a stair-step to get there," Himschoot said of the phase-in. "We have a report coming to us from every department in January so we know what's going on."

The most contentious debate centered on Section 4, which included intent language directing use of Rural Health Transformation Program funds for technology upgrades. Representative Kevin McCabe moved to remove the section, citing concerns it could jeopardize federal funding.